GDPR vs ISO 27001 vs SOC 2: Which Compliance Framework Actually Fits Your Company
Goktug Onyer
Cybersecurity Lead

"We need to be compliant" is one of the most common — and most confused — requests we get. There's GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, KVKK, HIPAA, PCI DSS, NIS2, the AI Act, and a dozen sector-specific regimes on top. They overlap, they contradict, and most companies pursue the wrong one first.
This is a clear-headed walkthrough of the three most asked-about frameworks, who actually needs each one, and roughly what it costs.
What each one is, in one sentence
- GDPR (and KVKK in Turkey, similarly LGPD in Brazil, CCPA in California) — a law. You don't "get certified" in GDPR. You either comply with it or you don't, and regulators can fine you up to 4% of global annual revenue if you don't.
- ISO 27001 — an international standard for information-security management systems. You can get formally certified by an accredited auditor. Useful as a buying signal in B2B, especially in Europe.
- SOC 2 — an American auditor's report(issued by a CPA firm) attesting that your controls meet specified criteria. There's a Type 1 (point in time) and Type 2 (over a period, usually 6–12 months). The de-facto standard for selling SaaS into US enterprises.
Who actually needs each one
GDPR / KVKK: everyone, no exceptions
If you have a website that's reachable from the EU and collects any personal data — a contact form, analytics, a newsletter — you're in scope. Same for KVKK if any of your users are in Turkey. There's no opt-out and no certification to chase; the compliance work is structural:
- Maintain a Record of Processing Activities (RoPA): every category of personal data you collect, why, where it's stored, who has access, how long you keep it.
- Publish a privacy notice that actually matches what you do (not a templated one).
- Implement lawful basis for each processing activity (consent, contract, legitimate interest, etc.).
- Respond to data-subject requests (access, deletion, portability) within the 30-day window.
- Sign Data Processing Agreements with every vendor that touches personal data on your behalf (Google Workspace, Stripe, your email provider, hosting, etc.).
- For transfers outside the EU: Standard Contractual Clauses plus a transfer impact assessment.
- Notify your supervisory authority (in Austria, the DSB; in Turkey, the KVKK's authority) within 72 hours of a notifiable breach.
Realistic cost. €3–10k for a one-off consultancy engagement to set this up properly, plus 4–8 hours/month of internal effort to maintain. Fines for non-compliance start in the tens of thousands and go up sharply with company size.
ISO 27001: when European enterprise customers ask for it
ISO 27001 establishes an Information Security Management System (ISMS) — a documented, audited approach to identifying risks and applying controls. The current version (ISO 27001:2022) has 93 controls in Annex A, organised into four themes: organisational, people, physical, and technological.
You should pursue ISO 27001 when:
- You sell B2B in Europe and prospects ask "are you ISO certified?" (this is increasingly table stakes for enterprise procurement)
- You handle sensitive personal data at scale (healthcare, fintech, education)
- You need a structured way to manage security across multiple teams/locations and want an external auditor to keep you honest
Realistic cost and timeline. First-time certification typically runs €25–80k all-in for a 50-person company, including:
- 3–6 months of preparation (gap assessment, policy authoring, risk register, control implementation)
- Stage 1 audit (documentation review)
- Stage 2 audit (operational review) by an accredited certification body
- Annual surveillance audits + a full recertification every 3 years
A good consultancy can compress preparation to ~12 weeks. Don't try to DIY it the first time — the document trail alone is a part-time job for three months.
SOC 2: when you sell SaaS into US enterprises
SOC 2 reports are organised around five Trust Service Criteria: Security (mandatory), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. Almost everyone scopes to Security + Confidentiality + maybe Availability.
Pursue SOC 2 when:
- You sell SaaS into US enterprise customers — they will require a SOC 2 Type 2 report before they sign
- You're raising venture funding and want to remove security from the due-diligence path
Realistic cost and timeline. Type 1 can be done in 2–3 months for €15–30k. Type 2 requires an observation window of 6–12 months and runs €30–60k all-in including auditor fees.
Tooling matters here. Platforms like Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, and Sprinto automate evidence collection (linking your AWS, Okta, GitHub, etc.) and can cut the prep work by 50–70%. They cost €8–25k/year on top of audit fees but are worth it for any company under ~200 employees.
Where they overlap (and where they don't)
About 60–70% of the controls overlap between ISO 27001, SOC 2, and a well-implemented GDPR programme. That means once you've done one properly, the second is faster.
Key non-overlapping bits to plan for:
- GDPR is a continuous legal obligation. ISO and SOC 2 don't replace it — even with both certifications, you still need a RoPA, DPAs with vendors, and a DPO if you're processing personal data at scale.
- ISO 27001 emphasises risk assessment and continual improvement (PDCA). SOC 2 emphasises evidence of controls operating over a period. The auditing styles are quite different.
- SOC 2 is point-in-time per criterion. ISO 27001 is broader scope and more management-system oriented.
The order most companies should pursue
- GDPR / KVKK first, always. It's the law. Get the RoPA, privacy notice, DPAs, and breach plan in place.
- If you sell to European enterprises — pursue ISO 27001 next.
- If you sell SaaS to US enterprises — pursue SOC 2 Type 1, then upgrade to Type 2 after a 6-month window.
- If you sell into both markets — there are joint-audit programmes that get you ISO 27001 + SOC 2 in parallel; ask your auditor.
What you should not do
- Don't download a privacy policy template and paste it on your site. Regulators look at actual practice vs. stated practice; mismatches cost more than no policy.
- Don't start with ISO 27001 if no customer is asking for it. You'll spend a year and €50k on a piece of paper that doesn't close deals.
- Don't do SOC 2 Type 2 before Type 1. Type 1 first forces you to fix gaps. Going straight to Type 2 means six months of observed failures.
- Don't rely solely on your compliance platform. Vanta et al. are fantastic for evidence collection, but they don't replace security engineering judgement. A platform can give you a green dashboard with bad controls.
The bottom line
Pick the framework your customers demand, not the one that looks most impressive. GDPR underpins everything if you have any European presence — get that solid first. ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are commercial tools that close deals; don't pursue them without a deal motivating it.
If you'd like an honest assessment of which framework actually fits your situation — and roughly what it would cost — our team does this kind of gap analysis as a fixed-scope engagement. Often saves clients more than the engagement costs in avoided wrong turns.



